The image of the “little horn” is a key component of Daniel’s visions. It represents a king from one of the four Hellenic kingdoms that evolved from Alexander the Great’s short-lived empire. Passages in Daniel concerning this figure also provide Paul with the outline for his “man of lawlessness” in 2 Thessalonians.
The
historical allusions in Daniel chapter 8 make its identity clear, and by
association, the identity of the fourth kingdom from the vision of four beasts
that Daniel saw “ascending” the chaotic sea from which this dark figure
appeared.
Its identification
sheds light on the most significant events described in the visions in the
second half of Daniel, including the “abomination that desolates”
and the cessation of the daily burnt offering – (Daniel 8:13, 9:27, 11:31, 12:11).
In chapter
8, the figures of the “ram” and the “goat” represent the kingdoms
of the “Medes and the Persians” and Greece, respectively. The
identifications are explicit in the vision’s interpretation - (Daniel 8:21-26).
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The kingdom of the
“Medes and Persians” was defeated by
a Macedonian force under Alexander who then ruled his new empire for only a few
years until his death in 323 B.C. Afterward, his generals fought for the
throne until a settlement was reached.
The empire
was divided into four smaller states ruled by Ptolemy, Seleucus, Cassander,
Antigonus. By 275 B.C., only three of the original four remained: Ptolemy in
Egypt, Seleucus in Syria and Babylon, and Antigonus in Greece and Macedonia.
Ptolemy I founded the Ptolemaic Kingdom in 305 B.C., a dynasty that endured until 30 B.C. Initially,
the small Jewish state in Judea was part of his realm, though he allowed it to govern its internal affairs.
The Seleucid
dynasty was founded in 312 B.C. and endured until 63 B.C. Intermittent wars
occurred between the Seleucid and Ptolemaic regimes over disputed territories,
with Judea located in the frontier between them. After several Seleucid
victories, Judea became part of its empire and remained so for several decades.
The
Seleucid rulers were tolerant of the Jewish nation and its religion. However, that
changed after the throne was seized by Antiochus IV (175 B.C.), who was
also known as Antiochus Epiphanés or “manifest god.”
Antiochus
was the younger brother of the legitimate king, Seleucus IV, and not the direct
heir to the throne. Seleucus was assassinated by his chancellor in 175 B.C. in an
attempt by him to seize the throne (2
Maccabees 3:21-28). His legitimate heirs were his two underage sons.
Antiochus
IV removed
the chancellor and installed himself as regent, although he was king in all but
name. After his youngest nephew died, he ruled openly as the absolute ruler of
the empire. His rise to power was unexpected and made possible only by unforeseen
circumstances.
IN THE VISION
The seizure
of the throne by Antiochus is portrayed in the vision of a fourth beast with
ten horns when three horns are removed to make way for the “little horn with a mouth speaking great
things” - (Daniel 7:1-14).
The ten
horns represent “ten kings who will arise.”
The “little horn” appeared later and was
“diverse” from the ten. That is, he was not the legitimate heir, and
three of the “ten horns” were “cast
down” so that he would inherit the
throne. In the Seleucid line, Antiochus IV is the eighth descendant to reign
since Seleucus I:
- Seleucus I [Nicantor] - (312-281 B.C.)
- Antiochus I [Sotér] - (281-261 B.C.)
- Antiochus II [Theos] - (261-246 B.C.)
- Seleucus II [Kallinikos] - (246-226 B.C.)
- Seleucus III [Keraunos] - (226-223 B.C.)
- Antiochus III [the Great] - (223-187 B.C.)
- Seleucus IV [Philopator] - (187-175 B.C.)
- Antiochus IV [Epiphanés] (175-163 B.C.)
To make way
for his seizure of the throne, three rivals were removed - the rebel
chancellor and the two sons of Seleucus IV. Thus, three horns were “uprooted”
so another would rule.
Two descriptive labels, “little horn” and “diverse,” distinguish Antiochus from his predecessors. Unlike them, he was not a direct heir, and he did not transition to power through legitimate means.
Once in
power, he waxed great “toward the south,
and the east, and the beauty.” The description alludes to his conflicts
with Egypt (south), Persia and other eastern territories, and with Judea - the
“beautiful land - (1 Maccabees 3:29-37).
Initially, Antiochus
was not hostile to the Jewish nation. Circumstances created by his wars with
Egypt along with internal conflicts among the Jewish leaders set the stage for his
later aggression against the Jews.
THE MALEVOLENT KING
When Antiochus
assumed the throne, the last legitimate high priest from the line of Zadok held
office in Jerusalem, Onias III. But his brother, Jason, a proponent of
Hellenism, bribed Antiochus to appoint him high priest in his place. In need of
money, the king accepted the bribe and made Jason the new high priest - (1
Kings 2:27-35, 1 Chronicles 29:22, 2
Maccabees 4:7-17).
Jason used
his position to promote Hellenism among the Jews. In 171 B.C., he sent an aid
named Menelaus to pay his annual tribute to Antiochus. But upon his arrival,
Menelaus offered the king an even larger bribe to make him the high priest. The
king welcomed the bribe and replaced Jason with Menelaus - (2 Maccabees 4:23-30).
Menelaus
was an apostate Jew and not a member of any priestly family. His appointment
was beyond the pale, causing great resentment among devout Jews. He became an
ally of Antiochus, and like Jason, he promoted Hellenism among the Jewish
people. Later, he robbed the vessels from the Temple treasury to pay his bribe
to the king.
Later, Onias
was denounced by Menelaus while the king was occupied in the eastern regions of
his empire. He had left one of his ministers in charge, Andronicus, whom Menelaus
bribed to execute Onias, an act that outraged pious Jews.
Up to this
point, Antiochus had remained friendly to the Jewish nation. To avoid further
offense against the religious sensibilities of the Jews, he had Andronicus
executed on the very spot where Onias had been killed. Regardless, in
the minds of many Jews, the execution of the legitimate high priest marked the
start of the Seleucid outrages against the Jewish nation.
THE PERSECUTION
In 169 B.C.,
Antiochus launched a military attack on Egypt, and this necessitated more tax revenue.
The temples of the various religions in his domain functioned as depositories for
great wealth, so he began to pillage them, including the Temple in Jerusalem -
a further sacrilege.
Upon his
return from Egypt, the king stopped in Jerusalem where Menelaus, the apostate
high priest, escorted him into the sanctuary, a place reserved only for the priests
of Yahweh. This defilement, along with the looting of the Temple, only deepened
Jewish resentment against Seleucid rule.
Antiochus launched
another expedition against Egypt in 168 B.C. This time things did not go well.
Rome intervened and stopped his attack. Rumors of Rome’s rebuff reached
Jerusalem even as the king began his return trip, which caused a revolt in the
city. In reaction, he sent soldiers to quell the rebellion, killing a significant
number of Jews and selling many others into slavery. Martial law was imposed, and
Jerusalem lost its status as a self-governing temple-state - (2 Maccabees 5:24-27).
These
events marked a new phase in the repression of the Jewish nation. Antiochus
now realized that the exclusivist faith of the Jews was responsible for their
resistance to his policies, so he took steps to eradicate their ancestral faith.
The Temple rituals were stopped, including the daily sacrifices. He outlawed the
observance of the Sabbath, circumcision, the Levitical dietary restrictions,
and other rituals. The sacred writings of the Jewish faith were banned and
burned.
THE ABOMINATION
These outrages
are behind the references in Daniel to “truth being cast down to the ground” and the attempt by the “little
horn” to “change times and the law”
- (Daniel 7:25, 8:12).
In December
168 B.C., the worst offense came with the placement of an altar to the pagan
deity Zeus Olympias on the altar of burnt offerings. On it, ritually
unclean animals were sacrificed to the Syrian deity. The book of First
Maccabees calls this profanation the “abomination
of desolation” - (1 Maccabees 4:54,
10:1-5).
The Aramaic
name for Zeus Olympias was Ba’al
Shamen, meaning, the “lord of heaven.” In Hebrew, “abomination of desolation” is a wordplay on this name. Among the devout Jews, the pagan name Ba’al was an “abomination” or shíqqûç, and the Hebrew word for “desolation,” shômem, sounded almost the same as the Aramaic shamen. Thus, shíqqûç shômem, “abomination of desolation,”
became the sarcastic retort to the sacrileges of Antiochus, the “little horn”
with the “mouth speaking great things.”
Altars to Zeus Olympias were erected in the towns and villages of Judea. Jews were
required to offer sacrifices to the pagan god or suffer the consequences. This
repression stirred up armed resistance, the Maccabean Revolt (167-160
B.C.). After several victories, the
armies of the Seleucid kingdom were driven from Palestine by rebel forces.
Jerusalem was
recaptured by the Jewish rebels in 165 B.C. The Temple was “cleansed” and
rededicated. This occurred a little over three years after the “abomination of desolation” had been
erected. The daily sacrifices were restored, and from that day forward they
continued without interruption until Jerusalem was destroyed by Rome in A.D. 70.
- (1 Maccabees 4:51-59).
Antiochus died
of an unknown disease in 164 B.C., only a few months after the Temple was restored.
At the time, he was campaigning in the eastern regions of his kingdom. Thus, he was “broken in pieces without hand” - (Daniel 8:25).
The first
three of the four “beasts from the sea” are identified in Daniel
as Babylon, the “Medes and Persians,” and the Greco-Macedonian Empire established
by Alexander. In turn, his realm was divided into four lesser domains after his
death - (Daniel 7:1-8, 8:15-26, 11:1-4).
HIS IDENTITY
The details
provided about the “little horn” are
too close to actual events to be coincidental. Antiochus ruled over one of the “lesser”
Greek kingdoms. He gained the throne by the removal of three rivals. Adding the
seven preceding kings of the Seleucid dynasty to the three rivals removed by
Antiochus, results in a total of ten “kings,” just as in the vision. Thus,
the “fourth beast” was the Seleucid kingdom that succeeded the
Macedonian kingdom of Alexander, that is, the “leopard” or third “beast.”
Antiochus claimed divine status by assuming the title Epiphanés or “manifest god.” On his coinage, he portrayed himself as Zeus Olympias manifested in the flesh. Thus, he was the boastful king “speaking great words.”
His persecution
of the Jews matches the details given in the vision in chapter 8. He removed the
daily sacrifice, desecrated the sanctuary, and oppressed the people of the
saints. The “time of indignation” continued until Jerusalem was freed
from Seleucid control and the Temple cleansed, a period of just over three
years.
In Daniel
7:25, “times and law” were given into
the hand of the “little horn” for “a
time, times and the dividing of time.” The persecution of the Jewish faith was
initiated in the summer of 168 B.C. and continued until December 165 B.C. The
political conflict that devolved into open persecution began in 171 B.C. with
the removal of Onias and his subsequent murder, a period of seven years.
The book of
Daniel defines the time of the “indignation” as the “dividing of time,” “two thousand and three
hundred evening-mornings,” that is, one thousand one hundred and fifty days
(1,150), and the “middle of the week,”
the last half of the final or “seventieth week.”
Thus, the
predicted events and timeframes of Daniel’s visions fit the history of the
conflicts between the Jews and Antiochus IV.
In chapter
7, the description of the “little horn” is symbolic and enigmatic,
making identification difficult. But the historical allusions in chapter 8 are
clear. The “little horn” is identified as the ruler from one of the four
kingdoms that developed from the conquests of Alexander the Great.
The historical references to the Medo-Persian
Empire, its overthrow by Greece, and the four lesser kingdoms that followed are,
likewise, crystal clear. The “little horn” can only be Antiochus or Epiphanés,
the illegitimate king Empire who waged war against Israel, desecrated the
Temple, and erected the “abomination that desolates.”